OM System OM OM-3 Black 2025
OM System
82 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
Fujifilm
20 Overall Score
Scores
Sports Wildlife
Travel
Vlogging
Streaming
Beginner
Wedding Events
Youtube
Photography
Product Photography
Video
Specifications
| OM System OM OM-3 | Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | BSI Stacked MOS | CMOS |
| Size | micro-four-thirds | 1/1.7-inch |
| Megapixels | 20.399999618530273 MP★ | 10 MP |
| ISO Range | 200★ | — |
| Processor | TruePic X | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | Phase Detection: 1053 | — |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Animal AF | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 120 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/32000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | — |
| 4K FPS | 60 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 60 fps★ | — |
| 10-bit | ✓★ | — |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| RAW Video | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | H.264, H.265 | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Articulating | ✓★ | ✗ |
| EVF Resolution | 2.4M dots★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.41 kg | 0.20 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | ✓★ | ✗ |
| USB | USB-C★ | — |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | ✗ |
Pros & Cons
OM System OM OM-3 Black 2025
- Strong af (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong burst (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong evf (96th percentile)96th %ile
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average sensor (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
Pricing
OM System OM OM-3 Black 2025
No current pricing available
Fujifilm Quicksnap Flash 400 Green
Verdict
Winner: OM System OM OM-3
Scores 82 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 23 of 31 specs.