Ediloca ES106 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Ediloca ES106 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Ediloca
29 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Kingston KC3000 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston KC3000 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Kingston
77 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Ediloca
73
Kingston
87
Workstation
Ediloca
28
Kingston
71
Laptop
Ediloca
26
Kingston
65
Gaming
Ediloca
19
Kingston
61
Console
Ediloca
9
Kingston
61
Portable
Ediloca
7
Kingston
19

Spezifikationen

Ediloca ES106Kingston KC3000
Drive
Capacity
256
512
Form Factor2.5"M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—4★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
520
7,000
Sequential Write (MB/s)
450
3,900
Random Read (IOPS)Keine Daten
450,000
Random Write (IOPS)Keine Daten
900,000
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache—✗
Controller—Phison E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)Keine Daten
400
MTBF (hours)Keine Daten
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink✗✓★

Vor- & Nachteile

Ediloca ES106 256GB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong affordability (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Below average speed (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)

Kingston KC3000 512GB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong endurance (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong random (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong feature (79th percentile)
  • Below average capacity (35th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Kingston KC3000

Scores 77 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 17 specs.

Kingston KC3000 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation