SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

SanDisk
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Silicon Power A60 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Silicon Power A60 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Silicon Power
45 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Console
SanDisk
86
Silicon Power
25
Workstation
SanDisk
85
Silicon Power
44
Gaming
SanDisk
85
Silicon Power
49
Budget
SanDisk
57
Silicon Power
71
Laptop
SanDisk
66
Silicon Power
51
Portable
SanDisk
23
Silicon Power
13

Spezifikationen

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100Silicon Power A60
Drive
Capacity
8,000
1,000
Form FactorM.2 2280M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation5★3
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
14,900
2,200
Sequential Write (MB/s)
13,200
1,600
Random Read (IOPS)
2,200,000
Keine Daten
Random Write (IOPS)
2,400,000
Keine Daten
Hardware
NANDTLCTLC
DRAM Cache✗—
ControllernCache 4.0—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
4,800
Keine Daten
MTBF (hours)
1,750,000
Keine Daten
Warranty (years)5★—
Features
Heatsink✓★—
Hardware Encryption✓★—

Vor- & Nachteile

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Silicon Power A60 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average endurance (15th percentile)15th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100

Scores 90 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.

SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 Besser bei:

GamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Silicon Power A60 Besser bei:

Budget