Seagate FireCuda 530R 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2

Seagate FireCuda 530R 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2

Seagate
68 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Western Digital
93 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Workstation
Seagate
69
Western Digital
95
Gaming
Seagate
62
Western Digital
93
Console
Seagate
56
Western Digital
92
Budget
Seagate
50
Western Digital
89
Laptop
Seagate
55
Western Digital
79
Portable
Seagate
15
Western Digital
25

Spezifikationen

Seagate FireCuda 530RWestern Digital WD_BLACK SN8100
Drive
Capacity
1,000
4,000
Form FactorM.2M.2 2280
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 5.0 x4
ProtocolNVMeNVMe
PCIe Generation45★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)Keine Daten
14,900
Sequential Write (MB/s)Keine Daten
14,000
Random Read (IOPS)Keine Daten
2,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)Keine Daten
2,400,000
Hardware
NAND—TLC★
DRAM Cache✓✓
ControllerSeagate validated E18 controller—
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
5,050
2,400
MTBF (hours)Keine Daten
1,750,000
Warranty (years)—3★
Features
Heatsink✓✓
Hardware Encryption—✓★

Vor- & Nachteile

Seagate FireCuda 530R 1TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2

  • Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong feature (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong random (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong speed (67th percentile)

Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong speed (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100

Scores 93 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 18 specs.

Western Digital WD_BLACK SN8100 Besser bei:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation