Crucial CT16G4DFD8266
Crucial
53 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Patriot Viper Venom
Patriot
79 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Server
Laptop
Spezifikationen
| Crucial CT16G4DFD8266 | Patriot Viper Venom | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 19★ | 36 |
| Timings | — | 36-36-36-76 |
| Voltage | — | 1.25★ |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO |
| Features | ||
| RGB | — | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | — | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Patriot Viper Venom
- Strong speed (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong latency (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
Preise
Crucial CT16G4DFD82660.408Score pro Dollar
vs
Patriot Viper Venom0.158Score pro Dollar
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266 bietet 2.6x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Patriot Viper Venom
Scores 79 overall, wins 4 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 15 specs.
