Crucial Desktop Memory
Crucial
30 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Netac
Netac
58 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Server
Spezifikationen
| Crucial Desktop Memory | Netac | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR3L | DDR4★ |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 1 | 2★ |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 240 | 288 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 13★ | 16 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858 | 1.350000023841858 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | — | Intel XMP 2.0 |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✗ | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Crucial Desktop Memory
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average speed (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Netac
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (73rd percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Fazit
Gewinner: Netac
Scores 58 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 6 of 14 specs.