ASUS MB16AC
ASUS
39 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
MSI
95 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Office
Professional
Gaming
Creative
Portable
Entertainment
Spezifikationen
| ASUS MB16AC | MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 15.6" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 5 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 220 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 16.7 Million Colors (6-Bit+FRC) | 99% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 6-Bit+FRC | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 0 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | 0 | 1★ |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓ | ✓ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Power | 8W★ | — |
| Weight | 0.78 kg★ | 8.00 kg |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASUS MB16AC
- Strong portability (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong ergonomic (66th percentile)
- Below average color (0th percentile)0th %ile
- Below average display (21st percentile)
- Below average performance (23rd percentile)
- Below average feature (24th percentile)
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
Preise
ASUS MB16AC0.173Score pro Dollar
vs
MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 20260.096Score pro Dollar
ASUS MB16AC bietet 1.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 28 specs.
