ATWYWTA Q160H 16" Black

ATWYWTA Q160H 16" Black

ATWYWTA
42 Gesamtbewertung
vs
ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5" Black 2025

ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5" Black 2025

ASUS
100 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Office
ATWYWTA
37
ASUS
91
Gaming
ATWYWTA
40
ASUS
91
Professional
ATWYWTA
36
ASUS
90
Creative
ATWYWTA
37
ASUS
89
Entertainment
ATWYWTA
34
ASUS
81
Portable
ATWYWTA
72
ASUS
15

Spezifikationen

ATWYWTA Q160H 16"ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5"
Display
Size16"27"
Resolution1920 x 12003840 x 2160
Panel TypeIPSOLED★
Aspect Ratio16:1016:9
Curved—✗
Performance
Refresh Rate144 Hz240 Hz★
Response Time—0.029999999329447746 ms★
Adaptive SyncFreeSyncFreeSync Premium Pro★
Color & HDR
Brightness—450 nits★
Color Gamut100% sRGB99% DCI-P3, 145% sRGB
Color Depth—10-bit★
HDRHDRDisplayHDR True Black 400
HDR SupportHDRHDR400
Connectivity
HDMI Ports—2★
DisplayPort—1★
USB-C—1★
Speakers✓★✗
Headphone Jack—✓★
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable—✓★
Tilt—✓★
Swivel—✓★
Pivot—✓★
VESA MountVESA Mountable100x100
Features
Webcam—✗
Touchscreen—✗
PIP/PBP—✓★
Power—80W★
Weight—7.44 kg★

Vor- & Nachteile

ATWYWTA Q160H 16" Black

  • Strong portability (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong feature (74th percentile)
  • Below average display (22nd percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (31st percentile)

ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5" Black 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5"

Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 28 specs.

ATWYWTA Q160H 16" Besser bei:

Portable

ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5" Besser bei:

GamingOfficeCreativeProfessionalEntertainment