Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

Tamron
46 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm

Nikon
75 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Landscape
Tamron
37
Nikon
98
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
35
Nikon
89
Macro
Tamron
49
Nikon
85
Budget
Tamron
53
Nikon
80
Travel
Tamron
47
Nikon
80
Professional
Tamron
28
Nikon
74
Video Cinema
Tamron
29
Nikon
65
Street
Tamron
36
Nikon
64
Portrait
Tamron
29
Nikon
53

Spezifikationen

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mmNikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min18 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max250 mm400 mm
Elements21
Groups15
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements4
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1822-45
Min Aperture3.5-6.34-8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon AFNikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.42 kg0.72 kg
Filter Thread77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm200 mm
Max Magnification1:3.51:2.86

Vor- & Nachteile

Tamron Di-II AF018C-700 18-250mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (66th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average aperture (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm

Scores 75 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 28-400mm f/4-8 VR 28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports