Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Tamron
100 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm

Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm

Laowa
30 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Tamron
97
Laowa
33
Macro
Tamron
95
Laowa
30
Landscape
Tamron
87
Laowa
30
Wildlife Sports
Tamron
85
Laowa
34
Professional
Tamron
85
Laowa
35
Street
Tamron
83
Laowa
30
Video Cinema
Tamron
82
Laowa
31
Portrait
Tamron
81
Laowa
28
Travel
Tamron
81
Laowa
24

Spezifikationen

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXDLaowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm200 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm200 mm
Elements2011
Groups139
Aspherical Elements3★—
ED Elements2★—
Coatingfluorine coating1034
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-7.1f/2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ECanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.59 kg★1.56 kg
Filter Thread67 mm105 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeVXD linear motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✓★✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★1.50 m
Max Magnification1:3.8★0.15x

Vor- & Nachteile

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile

Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm

  • Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average macro (29th percentile)

Preise

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD

Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III VC 28-300mm f/4-7.1 Di III VC VXD Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen