Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 20084 16-50mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 20084 16-50mm

Nikon
44 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Panasonic
95
Nikon
51
Travel
Panasonic
91
Nikon
33
Landscape
Panasonic
91
Nikon
32
Budget
Panasonic
90
Nikon
43
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Nikon
37
Professional
Panasonic
85
Nikon
31
Portrait
Panasonic
82
Nikon
42
Street
Panasonic
82
Nikon
34
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
82
Nikon
37

Spezifikationen

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mmNikon NIKKOR Z 20084 16-50mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm50 mm
Elements17
Groups13
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/6.3
Min Aperture4-7.1f/3.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-MountNikon Z
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg1.75 kg
Filter Thread67 mm46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops4.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm200 mm
Max Magnification0.5x

Vor- & Nachteile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 20084 16-50mm

  • Strong stabilization (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average build (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports