Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Brightin Star 35mm f/1.7 35mm

Brightin Star 35mm f/1.7 35mm

Brightin Star
45 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Panasonic
95
Brightin Star
39
Travel
Panasonic
91
Brightin Star
30
Landscape
Panasonic
91
Brightin Star
21
Budget
Panasonic
90
Brightin Star
42
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Brightin Star
24
Professional
Panasonic
85
Brightin Star
22
Portrait
Panasonic
82
Brightin Star
33
Street
Panasonic
82
Brightin Star
30
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
82
Brightin Star
20

Spezifikationen

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mmBrightin Star 35mm f/1.7 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm35 mm
Elements176
Groups134
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/16
Min Aperture4-7.1f/1.7
Constant
Diaphragm Blades910
Build
MountL-MountFujifilm X
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg0.33 kg
Filter Thread67 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusmanual focus only
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm280 mm
Max Magnification0.5x

Vor- & Nachteile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Brightin Star 35mm f/1.7 35mm

  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Strong build (73rd percentile)
  • Below average optical (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports