Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16mm F1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma Contemporary 16mm F1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma
45 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Panasonic
95
Sigma
17
Landscape
Panasonic
91
Sigma
16
Travel
Panasonic
91
Sigma
17
Budget
Panasonic
90
Sigma
45
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Sigma
41
Professional
Panasonic
85
Sigma
33
Portrait
Panasonic
82
Sigma
69
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
82
Sigma
29
Street
Panasonic
82
Sigma
46

Spezifikationen

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mmSigma Contemporary 16mm F1.4 DC DN 16mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min28 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm16 mm
Elements17
Groups13
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/1.4
Min Aperture4-7.1f/22
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountL-MountCanon RF
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg1.59 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm
Max Magnification0.5x

Vor- & Nachteile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16mm F1.4 DC DN 16mm

  • Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average build (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports