Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
vs
spovan HPL-N-2

spovan HPL-N-2

spovan
37 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Panasonic
95
spovan
25
Budget
Panasonic
91
spovan
40
Landscape
Panasonic
90
spovan
32
Video Cinema
Panasonic
87
spovan
50
Travel
Panasonic
86
spovan
41
Street
Panasonic
80
spovan
58
Professional
Panasonic
80
spovan
42
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
spovan
44
Portrait
Panasonic
77
spovan
51

Spezifikationen

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmspovan HPL-N-2
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min28 mm0 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm0 mm
Elements17—
Groups13—
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements4★—
CoatingFluorine coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4—
Min Aperture4-7.1—
Constant✗—
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountL-MountNikon F
Formatfull-frame★—
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.41 kg0.05 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus—
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm★—
Max Magnification0.5x★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

spovan HPL-N-2

  • Strong build (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong aperture (65th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average social proof (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports