Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
88 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 485101

Sigma 485101

Sigma
45 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Panasonic
98
Sigma
63
Budget
Panasonic
91
Sigma
42
Travel
Panasonic
90
Sigma
33
Landscape
Panasonic
87
Sigma
34
Video Cinema
Panasonic
86
Sigma
35
Street
Panasonic
80
Sigma
37
Professional
Panasonic
80
Sigma
37
Portrait
Panasonic
77
Sigma
26
Wildlife Sports
Panasonic
77
Sigma
31

Spezifikationen

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mmSigma 485101
Optics
Typezoomfisheye
Focal Length Min28 mm8 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm8 mm
Elements1711
Groups136
Aspherical Elements1★—
ED Elements4★1
CoatingFluorine coatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4f/22
Min Aperture4-7.1f/3.5
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades9★6
Build
MountL-MountNikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.41 kg0.40 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusAutofocus (with Nikon Cameras That Have an Autofocus Motor)
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops6.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance140 mm135 mm★
Max Magnification0.5x1:4.6★

Vor- & Nachteile

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)

Sigma 485101

  • Strong macro (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports