Sigma 202109
Sigma
38 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Nikon
78 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Video Cinema
Portrait
Professional
Street
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma 202109 | Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 10 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 20 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Nano Crystal Coat |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/3.5 | f/4 |
| Constant | — | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Nikon F |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weight | 0.52 kg★ | 0.68 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Silent Wave Motor |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 2.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 290 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma 202109
- Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
- Strong aperture (66th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average build (24th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (77th percentile)
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
- Strong stabilization (74th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Scores 78 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.