Laowa VE5028MFT 50mm

Laowa VE5028MFT 50mm

Laowa
63 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Laowa
58
Sigma
86
Street
Laowa
65
Sigma
86
Macro
Laowa
80
Sigma
82
Portrait
Laowa
69
Sigma
81
Travel
Laowa
46
Sigma
80
Budget
Laowa
52
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
Laowa
55
Sigma
74
Landscape
Laowa
41
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Laowa
37
Sigma
66

Spezifikationen

Laowa VE5028MFT 50mmSigma 207975
Optics
Typemacrowide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min50 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm18 mm
Elements1413
Groups1010
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
Formatmicro-four-thirdsAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.24 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread49 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance135 mm117 mm
Max Magnification2:11:4

Vor- & Nachteile

Laowa VE5028MFT 50mm

  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Preise

Both products are similarly priced.

Laowa VE5028MFT 50mm0.102Score pro Dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.126Score pro Dollar

Sigma 207975 bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Laowa VE5028MFT 50mm

Sigma 207975

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen