Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm
Canon
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Sony
82 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Street
Travel
Portrait
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm | Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 32 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 32 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | T3.2 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | T3.2 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.29 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 55 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | PZ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 460 mm | 249 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm
- Strong aperture (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong build (72th percentile)
- Below average optical (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
- Strong build (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Scores 82 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 20 specs.