Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm
Leica
27 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 180 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 180 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 7 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/3.5 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Leica S |
| Format | — | medium-format |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 1.15 kg★ |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Automatic/manual |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 1.52 m★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 14 specs.