Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM 400mm
Canon
72 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Professional
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM 400mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | super-telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 400 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 400 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Super Spectra and Air Sphere Coatings |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | — | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | Canon EF |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 2.84 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | USM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 2.50 m★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:5.9★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM 400mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average build (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
- Below average macro (35th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM 400mm
Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.