Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm

Fujifilm
54 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
61
Macro
Nikon
88
Fujifilm
48
Budget
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
56
Street
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
56
Portrait
Nikon
84
Fujifilm
50
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Fujifilm
61
Landscape
Nikon
79
Fujifilm
51
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Fujifilm
50
Travel
Nikon
70
Fujifilm
48

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm56 mm
Elements1313
Groups118
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements3★1
CoatingMulti-CoatedFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.2
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades911★
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.45 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★Autofocus
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★500 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★0.14x

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 56mm

  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Strong optical (75th percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports