Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

Rokinon
46 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Rokinon
39
Portrait
Nikon
89
Rokinon
32
Street
Nikon
86
Rokinon
50
Budget
Nikon
86
Rokinon
45
Macro
Nikon
85
Rokinon
36
Landscape
Nikon
83
Rokinon
44
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Rokinon
36
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Rokinon
41
Travel
Nikon
75
Rokinon
47

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements137
Groups116
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-CoatedUltra Multi Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.09 kg
Filter Thread67 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAuto Focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm350 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.12x

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Rokinon AF IO35AF-E 35mm

  • Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average macro (33rd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports