Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Rokinon Cine DS14M-MFT 14mm

Rokinon Cine DS14M-MFT 14mm

Rokinon
31 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
89
Rokinon
24
Macro
Nikon
88
Rokinon
52
Budget
Nikon
85
Rokinon
24
Street
Nikon
84
Rokinon
24
Portrait
Nikon
84
Rokinon
24
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Rokinon
24
Landscape
Nikon
79
Rokinon
27
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Rokinon
18
Travel
Nikon
70
Rokinon
20

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Rokinon Cine DS14M-MFT 14mm
Optics
Typezoomwide-angle
Focal Length Min17 mm14 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm14 mm
Elements137
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★2
ED Elements3★2
CoatingMulti-CoatedUMC coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/3.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZMicro Four Thirds
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★0.64 kg
Filter Thread67 mm114 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★manual focus only
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★254 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Rokinon Cine DS14M-MFT 14mm

  • Strong macro (77th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports