Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art

Canon 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art

Canon
28 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
89
Canon
41
Macro
Nikon
88
Canon
27
Budget
Nikon
85
Canon
33
Street
Nikon
84
Canon
38
Portrait
Nikon
84
Canon
36
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Canon
39
Landscape
Nikon
79
Canon
36
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Canon
34
Travel
Nikon
70
Canon
28

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements139
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements34★
ED Elements35★
CoatingMulti-Coated—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades9★—
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★—
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★HSM
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art

  • Strong optical (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong versatility (70th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (28th percentile)
  • Below average build (32nd percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports