Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
69 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
89
Viltrox
53
Macro
Nikon
88
Viltrox
67
Budget
Nikon
85
Viltrox
67
Street
Nikon
84
Viltrox
72
Portrait
Nikon
84
Viltrox
58
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Viltrox
61
Landscape
Nikon
79
Viltrox
55
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Viltrox
60
Travel
Nikon
70
Viltrox
56

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements1311
Groups119
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements3★1
CoatingMulti-Coatednano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.7
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weather Sealed✓★✗
Weight0.45 kg0.17 kg★
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorSTM★
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★330 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:7.7

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Viltrox AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (68th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports