TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 ASPH 10mm

TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 ASPH 10mm

TTArtisan
43 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Sony
84 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
TTArtisan
41
Sony
82
Travel
TTArtisan
34
Sony
82
Budget
TTArtisan
38
Sony
80
Portrait
TTArtisan
47
Sony
80
Wildlife Sports
TTArtisan
31
Sony
71
Video Cinema
TTArtisan
34
Sony
69
Landscape
TTArtisan
43
Sony
68
Professional
TTArtisan
37
Sony
64
Macro
TTArtisan
58
Sony
58

Spezifikationen

TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 ASPH 10mmSony E SELP1650 16-50mm
Optics
Typewide-anglezoom
Focal Length Min10 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max10 mm50 mm
Elements139
Groups108
Aspherical Elements24
ED Elements1
CoatingHD multilayer coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/3.5
Min Aperturef/23.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades87
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weight0.34 kg0.12 kg
Filter Thread72 mm41 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyPZ
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm249 mm
Max Magnification0.215x

Vor- & Nachteile

TTArtisan APS-C 10mm f/2.0 ASPH 10mm

  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Strong optical (70th percentile)
  • Strong build (66th percentile)
  • Below average af (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average social proof (33th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

  • Strong build (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average macro (34th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm

Scores 84 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sony E SELP1650 16-50mm Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports