Sigma MC-11

Sigma MC-11

Sigma
32 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
90 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Sigma
31
Canon
98
Portrait
Sigma
52
Canon
96
Video Cinema
Sigma
40
Canon
89
Street
Sigma
39
Canon
82
Travel
Sigma
19
Canon
80
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
36
Canon
76
Landscape
Sigma
19
Canon
75
Professional
Sigma
33
Canon
74
Macro
Sigma
20
Canon
67

Spezifikationen

Sigma MC-11Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min18 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm
Elements16
Groups12
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountCanon EFCanon EF-S
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.52 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm
Max Magnification0.28x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma MC-11

  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (70th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (68th percentile)
  • Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average social proof (24th percentile)
  • Below average build (31st percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (80th percentile)80th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports