Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Meike
44 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
Meike
40
Sigma
86
Professional
Meike
35
Sigma
86
Macro
Meike
48
Sigma
82
Portrait
Meike
43
Sigma
81
Travel
Meike
33
Sigma
80
Budget
Meike
41
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
Meike
33
Sigma
74
Landscape
Meike
34
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Meike
27
Sigma
66

Spezifikationen

Meike 35095 m43 35mmSigma 207975
Optics
Typeprimewide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min35 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm18 mm
Elements1013
Groups710
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements4
CoatingMulti-layer nano coatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/0.95f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades137
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.38 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread52 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm117 mm
Max Magnification1:4

Vor- & Nachteile

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

  • Strong build (68th percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (30th percentile)

Preise

Meike 35095 m43 35mm is 527 € cheaper (4.5x less).

Meike 35095 m43 35mm0.290Score pro Dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.126Score pro Dollar

Meike 35095 m43 35mm bietet 2.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Meike 35095 m43 35mm

Sigma 207975

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen