Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox AF 28/1.8 Z 28mm

Viltrox AF 28/1.8 Z 28mm

Viltrox
56 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Viltrox
62
Portrait
Sigma
90
Viltrox
55
Street
Sigma
88
Viltrox
62
Budget
Sigma
85
Viltrox
56
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Viltrox
60
Macro
Sigma
83
Viltrox
48
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Viltrox
54
Landscape
Sigma
77
Viltrox
53
Travel
Sigma
75
Viltrox
43

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmViltrox AF 28/1.8 Z 28mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm28 mm
Elements1611
Groups119
Aspherical Elements42
ED Elements53
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingHD Nano Multilayer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.37 kg
Filter Thread72 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm370 mm
Max Magnification1:5.550.1x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Viltrox AF 28/1.8 Z 28mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (78th percentile)
  • Strong build (69th percentile)
  • Below average macro (31st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports