Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm

Canon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm

Canon
72 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Canon
76
Portrait
Sigma
90
Canon
61
Street
Sigma
88
Canon
65
Budget
Sigma
85
Canon
66
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Canon
73
Macro
Sigma
83
Canon
64
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Canon
67
Landscape
Sigma
77
Canon
68
Travel
Sigma
75
Canon
53

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmCanon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements1614
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements42
ED Elements52
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSub Wavelength Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.56 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops7 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm280 mm
Max Magnification1:5.550.21x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Canon L RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM 35mm

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports