Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Meike MK-8MM-3.5 8mm

Meike MK-8MM-3.5 8mm

Meike
36 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Meike
35
Portrait
Sigma
90
Meike
28
Street
Sigma
88
Meike
29
Budget
Sigma
85
Meike
33
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Meike
25
Macro
Sigma
83
Meike
60
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Meike
28
Landscape
Sigma
77
Meike
40
Travel
Sigma
75
Meike
34

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmMeike MK-8MM-3.5 8mm
Optics
Typezoomfisheye
Focal Length Min16 mm8 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm8 mm
Elements1611
Groups118
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-Layer Nano Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ENikon F
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread72 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm100 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile

Meike MK-8MM-3.5 8mm

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (71st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Preise

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

No current pricing available

Meike MK-8MM-3.5 8mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen