Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Leica Super-Vario-Elmarit-SL 24mm

Leica Super-Vario-Elmarit-SL 24mm

Leica
37 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Leica
48
Portrait
Sigma
90
Leica
30
Street
Sigma
88
Leica
35
Budget
Sigma
85
Leica
35
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Leica
36
Macro
Sigma
83
Leica
56
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Leica
39
Landscape
Sigma
77
Leica
55
Travel
Sigma
75
Leica
37

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmLeica Super-Vario-Elmarit-SL 24mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm14 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm24 mm
Elements1618
Groups1113
Aspherical Elements43
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-Layer & Aqua-Dura Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony EL-Mount
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.85 kg
Filter Thread72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm280 mm
Max Magnification1:5.551:11.4

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Leica Super-Vario-Elmarit-SL 24mm

  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (68th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (22nd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports