Sigma Sports 730956 300-600mm

Sigma Sports 730956 300-600mm

Sigma
41 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
57
Nikon
89
Macro
Sigma
55
Nikon
88
Budget
Sigma
44
Nikon
85
Street
Sigma
44
Nikon
84
Portrait
Sigma
44
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Sigma
55
Nikon
82
Landscape
Sigma
53
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
54
Nikon
73
Travel
Sigma
37
Nikon
70

Spezifikationen

Sigma Sports 730956 300-600mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typesuper-telephotozoom
Focal Length Min600 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max600 mm28 mm
Elements2813
Groups2111
Aspherical Elements—3★
ED Elements—3★
Coating—Multi-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/22f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades13★9
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatFull-Framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight1.81 kg0.45 kg★
Filter Thread41 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusStepping Motor★
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance2.80 m190 mm★
Max Magnification1:61:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Sports 730956 300-600mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Preise

Sigma Sports 730956 300-600mm

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

No current pricing available

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports