Sigma 49B969

Sigma 49B969

Sigma
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
89 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Sigma
70
Canon
91
Landscape
Sigma
52
Canon
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
61
Canon
83
Professional
Sigma
68
Canon
82
Travel
Sigma
34
Canon
82
Budget
Sigma
54
Canon
80
Portrait
Sigma
79
Canon
53
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
47
Canon
79
Street
Sigma
59
Canon
68

Spezifikationen

Sigma 49B969Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min20 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max20 mm70 mm
Elements1315
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements22
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating, Nano Porous Coating (NPC)Super Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2f/22
Min Aperturef/2f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountL-MountCanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight4.13 kg0.49 kg
Filter Thread62 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance220 mm239 mm
Max Magnification1:6.671:4.2

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma 49B969

  • Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Sigma 49B969 Besser bei:

Portrait

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports