Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mm
Tamron
61 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm
Sony
90 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Portrait
Landscape
Professional
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mm | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 18 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 1★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/18 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Sony E |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.40 kg | 0.11 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping motor★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 18 mm★ | 250 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mm
- Strong macro (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average bokeh (21st percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
Preise
Tamron Di III VC AF014P-700 18-200mm0.227Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm0.413Score pro Dollar
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm bietet 1.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm
Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
