Yongnuo YN 12-35mm f/2.8-4M 35mm

Yongnuo YN 12-35mm f/2.8-4M 35mm

Yongnuo
75 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Yongnuo
92
Sigma
16
Professional
Yongnuo
83
Sigma
42
Portrait
Yongnuo
82
Sigma
59
Street
Yongnuo
80
Sigma
46
Wildlife Sports
Yongnuo
77
Sigma
39
Landscape
Yongnuo
72
Sigma
33
Travel
Yongnuo
70
Sigma
40
Budget
Yongnuo
68
Sigma
56
Video Cinema
Yongnuo
68
Sigma
47

Spezifikationen

Yongnuo YN 12-35mm f/2.8-4M 35mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min12 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements14
Groups11
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements3
CoatingAnti-Fouling Fluoride Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperture2.8-4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountMicro Four Thirds
Formatmicro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.32 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeDSM Stepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance110 mm
Max Magnification1:2

Vor- & Nachteile

Yongnuo YN 12-35mm f/2.8-4M 35mm

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average social proof (8th percentile)8th %ile

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Yongnuo YN 12-35mm f/2.8-4M 35mm

Scores 75 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Yongnuo YN 12-35mm f/2.8-4M 35mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports