Sigma 346306 50mm
Sigma
32 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Sigma 346306 50mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 50 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 13 |
| Groups | 9 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 3★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | Super Multi Coating | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.32 kg★ | 0.45 kg |
| Filter Thread | 55 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Stepping Motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 188 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:1 | 1:5.26 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma 346306 50mm
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong build (74th percentile)
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.