MGHOAQFRS B39
MGHOAQFRS
38 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Beyerdynamic
82 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Commute
Music
Gaming
Work
Studio
Calls
Spezifikationen
| MGHOAQFRS B39 | Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | — | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | Skin-friendly Leather Material | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | — | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 22 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 48 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | Bluetooth Headphones Over Ear, Noise Reduction Wireless Headphones with Microphone/Deep Bass, HiFi Stereo Foldable Lightweight LED Headset for PC Home Travel Office | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 6 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 1 hrs★ | 1.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 15 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
MGHOAQFRS B39
- Strong comfort (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong anc (74th percentile)
- Strong mic (68th percentile)
- Below average battery (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (14th percentile)14th %ile
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
Preise
MGHOAQFRS B390.746Score pro Dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.418Score pro Dollar
MGHOAQFRS B39 bietet 1.8x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 39 specs.
