ASHATA GeForce GT 210 1GB DDR3
ASHATA
21 Gesamtbewertung
vs
AISURIX Radeon RX 590 8GB GDDR5
AISURIX
36 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Workstation
Content Creation
Ray Tracing
Budget
Gaming 1080p
Gaming 1440p
Ai Llm
Gaming 4k
Spezifikationen
| ASHATA GeForce GT 210 | AISURIX Radeon RX 590 | |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | ||
| GPU Chipset | GeForce GT 210 | Radeon RX 590 |
| Brand | NVIDIA | AMD |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | 12nm |
| Class | consumer | consumer |
| Process | 5★ | 12 |
| Memory | ||
| VRAM | 1 GB | 8 GB★ |
| Memory Type | DDR3 | GDDR5★ |
| Memory Bus | ||
| Bandwidth | ||
| Compute | ||
| Stream Processors | ||
| RT Cores | 54 | 54 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| FP16 TFLOPS | 55.29999923706055 | 55.29999923706055 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 27.649999618530273 | 27.649999618530273 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark G3D | Keine Daten | |
| GPU Compute | Keine Daten | |
| Power & Cooling | ||
| TDP | 60★ | 295 |
| Recommended PSU | 200★ | 450 |
| Power Connectors | None | — |
| Cooler | Fan | Dual Fan★ |
| Fans | 1 | 2★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Interface | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| DisplayPort | — | 2★ |
| HDMI | 1 | 1 |
| Max Displays | — | 2★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.21 kg★ | — |
| Features | ||
| DirectX | 10.1 | — |
| RGB | — | ✗ |
Vor- & Nachteile
ASHATA GeForce GT 210 1GB DDR3
- Strong compute (75th percentile)
- Below average raster (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average efficiency (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average vram (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average feature (12th percentile)12th %ile
AISURIX Radeon RX 590 8GB GDDR5
- Strong compute (75th percentile)
- Below average feature (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average efficiency (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average raster (25th percentile)
- Below average vram (27th percentile)
Preise
ASHATA GeForce GT 210 1GB DDR30.424Score pro Dollar
vs
AISURIX Radeon RX 590 8GB GDDR50.228Score pro Dollar
ASHATA GeForce GT 210 1GB DDR3 bietet 1.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: AISURIX Radeon RX 590
Scores 36 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 11 of 29 specs.
