TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sennheiser CX 80S

Sennheiser CX 80S

Sennheiser
50 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
TOZO
79
Sennheiser
60
Gaming
TOZO
79
Sennheiser
45
Travel
TOZO
78
Sennheiser
42
Fitness
TOZO
72
Sennheiser
37
Calls
TOZO
70
Sennheiser
36
Commute
TOZO
70
Sennheiser
42
Music
TOZO
68
Sennheiser
55

Spezifikationen

TOZO Crystal PodsSennheiser CX 80S
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelessear-tip
Ear TipsMediumS, M, L
Weight0.04 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm9.699999809265137 mm
Drivers9
Freq Min20 Hz17 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω28 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACSennheiser CX 80S 3.5 mm, angled Connector Ear canal Wired In-Ear Headphones
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Sennheiser CX 80S

  • Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong sound (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong anc (66th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (31st percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

Preise

TOZO Crystal Pods

No current pricing available

Sennheiser CX 80S

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 37 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Auch in Betracht ziehen