MEE Audio EP-M11J-TQ-MEE

MEE Audio EP-M11J-TQ-MEE

MEE Audio
37 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Calls
MEE Audio
25
Technics
99
Travel
MEE Audio
28
Technics
99
Music
MEE Audio
42
Technics
95
Budget
MEE Audio
45
Technics
93
Commute
MEE Audio
27
Technics
92
Gaming
MEE Audio
36
Technics
91
Fitness
MEE Audio
30
Technics
85

Spezifikationen

MEE Audio EP-M11J-TQ-MEETechnics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear Tipss5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.01 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver Type7mmDynamic
Driver Size7 mm10 mm
Drivers71
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz40 kHz
Impedance16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mmBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOS
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4

Vor- & Nachteile

MEE Audio EP-M11J-TQ-MEE

  • Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong sound (82th percentile)82th %ile
  • Below average social proof (23th percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (26th percentile)
  • Below average anc (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 38 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness