HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 Black 2026

Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 Black 2026

Dell
58 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
HP
91
Dell
12
Creator
HP
87
Dell
23
Developer
HP
87
Dell
57
Home Office
HP
87
Dell
57
Business
HP
87
Dell
65
Workstation
HP
86
Dell
52
Ai Llm
HP
68
Dell
24
Compact
HP
30
Dell
59

Spezifikationen

HP OMEN GT16-0364Dell Pro Slim QCS1250
Processor
CPUAMD Ryzen 7 8700F★Intel Core Ultra 5 (Series 2)
CPU Multi-Core Score
30,931
Keine Daten
Cores814★
Frequency4.1 GHz★3.4 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB★
Graphics
GPU*NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★Intel Graphics
GPU Benchmark Score
28,703
3,170
Typediscreteintegrated★
VRAM12 GB★—
VRAM TypeGDDR7—
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB★16 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB★512 GB
Storage 1 TypeSSDNVMe SSD★
Build
Form Factormid-towermini
PSU850W★180W
Weight14.50 kg—
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2★1
USB Ports8★4
Thunderbolt0—
HDMI1 x HDMI1x HDMI 2.1
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort1x Display Port
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6★—
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3★No
EthernetGigabit EthernetRJ-45
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Pro

Vor- & Nachteile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 Black 2026

  • Strong cpu (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong reliability (70th percentile)

Fazit

★ Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 13 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Dell Pro Slim QCS1250 Besser bei:

Compact