Dell ECT 1250

Dell ECT 1250

Dell
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
94 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Dell
12
HP
90
Business
Dell
67
HP
86
Developer
Dell
66
HP
86
Creator
Dell
24
HP
86
Workstation
Dell
55
HP
85
Home Office
Dell
67
HP
84
Ai Llm
Dell
23
HP
66
Compact
Dell
36
HP
30

Spezifikationen

Dell ECT 1250HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPUIntel Core Ultra 5225AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core ScoreKeine Daten
31,207
Cores108
Frequency3.3 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache20 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Intel UHD Graphics 730NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
1,514
28,796
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 12 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towermid-tower
PSU180W850W
Weight14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports12
USB Ports78
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1x HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5Bluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

Dell ECT 1250

  • Strong cpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong storage (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong port (82th percentile)82th %ile
  • Strong reliability (71th percentile)
  • Below average gpu (31th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 94 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 11 of 26 specs.

Dell ECT 1250 Besser bei:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation