Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Black 2025

Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Black 2025

Dell
77 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
94 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Dell
15
HP
90
Business
Dell
81
HP
86
Developer
Dell
73
HP
86
Creator
Dell
29
HP
86
Workstation
Dell
66
HP
85
Home Office
Dell
80
HP
84
Ai Llm
Dell
26
HP
66
Compact
Dell
34
HP
30

Spezifikationen

Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*Intel Core Ultra 7-265AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
49,655
31,207
Cores208
Frequency2.4 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache30 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Intel UHD GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
1,514
28,796
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM48 GB12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR6GDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factormid-towermid-tower
PSU850W
Weight5.45 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports12
USB Ports88
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1x HDMI 2.11 x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort 1.4a3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetoothBluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Black 2025

  • Strong social proof (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong cpu (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong port (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong storage (72th percentile)
  • Below average gpu (31th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 94 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 7 of 26 specs.

Dell Tower Desktop ECT1250 Besser bei:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation