Lenovo ThinkCentre neo 50s 12XF000VUS Black 2025

Lenovo ThinkCentre neo 50s 12XF000VUS Black 2025

Lenovo
49 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
95 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Lenovo
9
HP
91
Business
Lenovo
57
HP
87
Creator
Lenovo
17
HP
87
Developer
Lenovo
39
HP
87
Home Office
Lenovo
51
HP
87
Workstation
Lenovo
39
HP
85
Ai Llm
Lenovo
17
HP
67
Compact
Lenovo
44
HP
31

Spezifikationen

Lenovo ThinkCentre neo 50s 12XF000VUSHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*Intel Core i5AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
25,101
30,931
Cores108
Frequency2.5 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache20 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Intel UHD Graphics 730NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
1,534
28,703
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5
Storage 1256 GB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form Factorsffmid-tower
PSU850W
Weight14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports8
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

Lenovo ThinkCentre neo 50s 12XF000VUS Black 2025

  • Strong reliability (71st percentile)
  • Below average storage (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average port selection (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average ram (31st percentile)
  • Below average gpu (31st percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port selection (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 95 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 13 of 26 specs.

Lenovo ThinkCentre neo 50s 12XF000VUS Besser bei:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation