MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
MICRO CENTER
66 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2680V4 12-core FCLGA2011-3
Intel
41 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Productivity
Efficiency
Gaming
Budget
Ai Llm
Server
Spezifikationen
| MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF | Intel Xeon E5-2680V4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | — | Intel |
| Series | — | Xeon |
| Model | — | E5-2680V4 |
| Class | — | server |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 12★ |
| Threads | — | 28★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Boost Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 4★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 35★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| Channels | — | 4★ |
| Max Memory | Keine Daten | |
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | — | FCLGA2011-3 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40★ |
| TDP | — | 120★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
- Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (21st percentile)
Intel Xeon E5-2680V4 12-core FCLGA2011-3
- Strong platform (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average single thread (7th percentile)7th %ile
Preise
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF0.025Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2680V4 12-core FCLGA2011-30.282Score pro Dollar
Intel Xeon E5-2680V4 12-core FCLGA2011-3 bietet 11.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Scores 66 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.
