Intel BX80768265F

Intel BX80768265F

Intel
90 Gesamtbewertung
vs
DAKboard CPU v4

DAKboard CPU v4

DAKboard
16 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Efficiency
Intel
99
DAKboard
13
Budget
Intel
95
DAKboard
19
Productivity
Intel
94
DAKboard
16
Ai Llm
Intel
90
DAKboard
10
Gaming
Intel
81
DAKboard
16
Server
Intel
76
DAKboard
12

Spezifikationen

Intel BX80768265FDAKboard CPU v4
Processor
BrandIntel—
SeriesCore Ultra 7Cortex
Model265F—
CodenameArrow Lake—
Classdesktopdesktop
Process3★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores20★4
P-cores8★—
E-cores12★—
Threads20★—
Base Clock
2,400
1,800
Boost Clock
5,300
Keine Daten
Cache
L2 Cache36★—
L3 Cache30★—
Performance
PassMark Multi
49,365
Keine Daten
PassMark Single
4,748
Keine Daten
Memory
Memory TypeDDR5★—
Max Speed
6,400
Keine Daten
Channels2★—
Max Memory
256
Keine Daten
ECC✗—
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1851BGA
PCIe5.0—
PCIe Lanes24★—
TDP65★—
Max Turbo Power182★—
Unlocked✗—
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsNone—
NPU TOPS3.5★—

Vor- & Nachteile

Intel BX80768265F

  • Strong efficiency (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong single thread (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong ai (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

DAKboard CPU v4

  • Below average efficiency (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average ai (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile

Preise

DAKboard CPU v4 is 127 € cheaper (1.4x less).

Intel BX80768265F0.217Score pro Dollar
vs
DAKboard CPU v40.056Score pro Dollar

Intel BX80768265F bietet 3.9x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Intel BX80768265F

DAKboard CPU v4

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Intel BX80768265F

Scores 90 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 19 of 29 specs.

Intel BX80768265F Besser bei:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen