Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151
Intel
39 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Spezifikationen
| Thermal Grizzly 000 | Intel Celeron G3900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | — | Celeron |
| Model | 000 | G3900 |
| Codename | — | Skylake |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | — | 14★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | — | 2★ |
| Threads | — | 2★ |
| Base Clock | Keine Daten | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | — | 2★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 2★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | Keine Daten | |
| PassMark Single | Keine Daten | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | — | DDR4★ |
| Max Speed | Keine Daten | |
| Channels | — | 2★ |
| Max Memory | — | 64★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM5 | LGA1151 |
| TDP | — | 51★ |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151
- Strong affordability (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Below average ai (23rd percentile)
- Below average multi thread (27th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (35th percentile)
Preise
Thermal Grizzly 000 AM50.489Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA11510.754Score pro Dollar
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151 bietet 1.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Intel Celeron G3900
Scores 39 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 21 specs.
