Kodak PIXPRO FZ45 Red

Kodak PIXPRO FZ45 Red

Kodak
16 Gesamtbewertung
vs
OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II Silver 2015

OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II Silver 2015

OM System
51 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Sports Wildlife
Kodak
5
OM System
53
Wedding Events
Kodak
8
OM System
48
Travel
Kodak
13
OM System
46
Beginner
Kodak
18
OM System
46
Video
Kodak
18
OM System
44
Photography
Kodak
6
OM System
43
Streaming
Kodak
22
OM System
43
Vlogging
Kodak
10
OM System
41
Youtube
Kodak
15
OM System
38
Product Photography
Kodak
15
OM System
33

Spezifikationen

Kodak PIXPRO FZ45OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II
Sensor
TypeCMOSMOS
Size1/2.3-inchmicro-four-thirds
Megapixels16.350000381469727 MP16 MP
ISO Range100100
Autofocus
AF Points981
Eye AF
Animal AF
Subject Detection
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)8.5 fps
Max Shutter1/20001/4
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution1080p1080p
1080p FPS30 fps
Log Profile
Display & EVF
Screen Size2.7"
Touchscreen
Articulating
EVF Resolution2.3M dots
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.12 kg0.39 kg
Battery Life120 shots
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
USBMicro-USB (USB 2.0)
Hot Shoe

Vor- & Nachteile

Kodak PIXPRO FZ45 Red

  • Strong social proof (78th percentile)
  • Below average battery (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average build (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average af (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average sensor (14th percentile)14th %ile

OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II Silver 2015

  • Strong user sentiment (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong evf (75th percentile)
  • Strong build (75th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II

Scores 51 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 6 of 25 specs.

OM System OM-D E-M10 Mark II Besser bei:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography