Team Group T-FORCE G50
Team Group
70 综合评分
vs
Samsung 990 PRO
Samsung
98 综合评分
买家怎么说
Team Group T-FORCE G50
82 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
用户普遍赞赏这款SSD的实惠价格和扎实性能，认为非常适合日常使用和游戏。有人提到需要手动安装散热片和不必要的状态LED等小缺点，但总体满意度很高。
优点
- 价格实惠
- 读写速度快
- 在NAS中运行良好
- 安装简便
- 性价比高
缺点
- 手动安装散热片
- 不必要的状态LED
- 无DRAM控制器
Value for money 4
Performance 5
Ease of installation 2
Heatsink attachment 2
Status led 1
Dram controller 1
Samsung 990 PRO
88 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
用户对这款SSD非常满意，称赞其在游戏和照片编辑方面的卓越速度和可靠性能。一位用户提到在激烈游戏时没有散热器温度达到62°C的热担忧，但整体情绪仍然非常积极。该驱动器易于安装，并已证明在一年使用中经久耐用。
优点
- 极速速度
- 安装简便
- 性能可靠
- 翻新价格物有所值
缺点
- 高负载下热担忧
- 不含散热器
Speed 5
Reliability 3
Ease of installation 2
Value for money 1
Thermal performance 1
评分
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Laptop
Portable
规格
| Team Group T-FORCE G50 | Samsung 990 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Controller | InnoGrit | Samsung |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hardware Encryption | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Team Group T-FORCE G50
- Strong endurance (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong feature (78th percentile)
- Strong speed (74th percentile)
Samsung 990 PRO
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
结论
胜出: Samsung 990 PRO
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 18 specs.